The Anime Encyclopedia
The Anime Encyclopedia: A Guide to Japanese Animation Since 1917 is a book by Jonathan Clements and Helen McCarthy. The book was originally published in 2001, and a "Revised & Expanded Edition" was released in 2006. This review focuses on the "Revised & Expanded Edition."
The book claims to have over 3,000 entries for shows, studios, creators, and anime history. It also claims the book is aimed at both "newcomers and battle-hardened otaku." By the time I finished reading this book, however, I wasn't truly convinced that this book is either for newcomers or "battle-hardened otaku."
The biggest issue I had was the number of mistakes I found in this book for the properties that I'm familiar with. While I don't expect a book of this nature to be 100% accurate, I was astonished by just how many errors I found. Considering I know only a small number of properties that are included in the book, this is actually a rather high error ratio. And if this error ratio were to remain constant throughout the whole text, then that would mean there are a lot of errors in this book.
The worst error I found was the entry for the Fruits Basket anime series. For one thing, the Chinese Zodiac curse is never mentioned at all in the writeup; in fact, the authors of the book claim the Sohmas are "sorcerers and shape shifters" in order to explain how the characters can change into animals. This made me wonder if the authors actually watched some of the show, and if they did, how much attention did they pay to it?
Another big error is in the entry for Interstella 5555: The 5tory of the 5ecret 5tar 5ystem, where the authors incorrectly state that the Crescendolls are rescued by a female pilot (when, in the anime, the pilot character is very obviously male). If I'm finding these kinds of blatant errors in properties I'm familiar with, then how many other major errors are included in the book?
Another issue I had with the book is that the authors insisted on using the titles that the properties were released under in the United States, rather than English translations of the Japanese titles. As a couple of examples, you can only find Space Battleship Yamato under Star Blazers, and you can only find Yu Yu Hakusho under Poltergeist Report.
Also, when writing the descriptions for the properties, the authors tended to talk about the American version first, and then explain the differences between the English and the Japanese versions. As this is supposed to be a guide for Japanese animation, the authors definitely show more of a bias toward the English versions.
I also had problems with how inconsistently the authors handled some things. The biggest gripe I had with inconsistency comes with how they treated shows that were popular in the United States that were comprised of more than one show. In the book, you can find separate entries for Robotech, Macross, Southern Cross, and Mospeada. However, for Voltron, there are not separate entries for Beast King GoLion or Dairugger XV.
This encyclopedia is also filled with quite a few snarky comments. The worst case of the snarkiness is the entry for Pure Love, where the entire description of the property is a snarky comment. While the snarky comments can be amusing at times, I felt they were overused by the authors.
When reading the book, it felt as if the authors tried early on to be level-handed, but as they got further into the book, they started showing their biases more and more, which is illustrated by the fact that the amount of snarky comments goes up as the book progresses. Sometimes with their snarky comments, the authors came across with a kind of elitist attitude.
Overall, the authors did a decent job with the historical aspects of anime. However, I do have to complain that in the section about "Censorship and Localization," they never mentioned the editing of innocuous Japanese references from properties that was rather prevalent in the 1980s (such as calling rice balls other kinds of food if they appear in a shot, and cutting away from Japanese text as quickly as possible).
While I may have a number of issues with The Anime Encyclopedia, I have to say that its most redeeming value is that it provides titles for various anime shows and how they inter-relate. However, I'm not sure that this book in and of itself is worth the money it takes to purchase it. In this day and age of the Internet, you are more likely to find more information (not to mention more accurate information) on the fanpages for the various anime properties included in this book. Before putting down any money to purchase The Anime Encyclopedia, try to locate a copy through your local library first and sample it that way.
In order to write this review, I checked out a copy of this book through the King County Library System.
The book claims to have over 3,000 entries for shows, studios, creators, and anime history. It also claims the book is aimed at both "newcomers and battle-hardened otaku." By the time I finished reading this book, however, I wasn't truly convinced that this book is either for newcomers or "battle-hardened otaku."
The biggest issue I had was the number of mistakes I found in this book for the properties that I'm familiar with. While I don't expect a book of this nature to be 100% accurate, I was astonished by just how many errors I found. Considering I know only a small number of properties that are included in the book, this is actually a rather high error ratio. And if this error ratio were to remain constant throughout the whole text, then that would mean there are a lot of errors in this book.
The worst error I found was the entry for the Fruits Basket anime series. For one thing, the Chinese Zodiac curse is never mentioned at all in the writeup; in fact, the authors of the book claim the Sohmas are "sorcerers and shape shifters" in order to explain how the characters can change into animals. This made me wonder if the authors actually watched some of the show, and if they did, how much attention did they pay to it?
Another big error is in the entry for Interstella 5555: The 5tory of the 5ecret 5tar 5ystem, where the authors incorrectly state that the Crescendolls are rescued by a female pilot (when, in the anime, the pilot character is very obviously male). If I'm finding these kinds of blatant errors in properties I'm familiar with, then how many other major errors are included in the book?
Another issue I had with the book is that the authors insisted on using the titles that the properties were released under in the United States, rather than English translations of the Japanese titles. As a couple of examples, you can only find Space Battleship Yamato under Star Blazers, and you can only find Yu Yu Hakusho under Poltergeist Report.
Also, when writing the descriptions for the properties, the authors tended to talk about the American version first, and then explain the differences between the English and the Japanese versions. As this is supposed to be a guide for Japanese animation, the authors definitely show more of a bias toward the English versions.
I also had problems with how inconsistently the authors handled some things. The biggest gripe I had with inconsistency comes with how they treated shows that were popular in the United States that were comprised of more than one show. In the book, you can find separate entries for Robotech, Macross, Southern Cross, and Mospeada. However, for Voltron, there are not separate entries for Beast King GoLion or Dairugger XV.
This encyclopedia is also filled with quite a few snarky comments. The worst case of the snarkiness is the entry for Pure Love, where the entire description of the property is a snarky comment. While the snarky comments can be amusing at times, I felt they were overused by the authors.
When reading the book, it felt as if the authors tried early on to be level-handed, but as they got further into the book, they started showing their biases more and more, which is illustrated by the fact that the amount of snarky comments goes up as the book progresses. Sometimes with their snarky comments, the authors came across with a kind of elitist attitude.
Overall, the authors did a decent job with the historical aspects of anime. However, I do have to complain that in the section about "Censorship and Localization," they never mentioned the editing of innocuous Japanese references from properties that was rather prevalent in the 1980s (such as calling rice balls other kinds of food if they appear in a shot, and cutting away from Japanese text as quickly as possible).
While I may have a number of issues with The Anime Encyclopedia, I have to say that its most redeeming value is that it provides titles for various anime shows and how they inter-relate. However, I'm not sure that this book in and of itself is worth the money it takes to purchase it. In this day and age of the Internet, you are more likely to find more information (not to mention more accurate information) on the fanpages for the various anime properties included in this book. Before putting down any money to purchase The Anime Encyclopedia, try to locate a copy through your local library first and sample it that way.
In order to write this review, I checked out a copy of this book through the King County Library System.
This site needs an editor - click to learn more!
You Should Also Read:
Eye on Art: Anime
Anime Essentials
The Anime Companion
Related Articles
Editor's Picks Articles
Top Ten Articles
Previous Features
Site Map
Content copyright © 2023 by Lesley Aeschliman. All rights reserved.
This content was written by Lesley Aeschliman. If you wish to use this content in any manner, you need written permission. Contact
BellaOnline Administration
for details.